Below is a link to the radio performance of Julius Caesar.
Task:
1. Review your notes from Friday's class about tone and shifts in tone. How did your group imagine Cassius and Brutus?
2. Play the audio file. (I.i.113-220 begins at about 9 minutes into the recording). Listen to the tone of the actors.
Begin with Cassius. Describe the shifts in tone employed by the actor.
Listen again for Brutus. Describe the shifts in tone employed by the actor.
3. Write a response. Due Monday. Post your response in the Comments section.
Compare and Contrast the choices made by your group and the choices of the actors.
From the radio performance: How do the shifts in tone indicate the tactics being used?
Opening the file: When you click on the link it will open on the same page. The file is large, so be patient.
radio Julius Caesar
Update: If you are having trouble playing the file, I cut an alternate mp3 to include only Act I.
Act I
Cassius was confident yet sneaky at the same time. He knew which words to say to Brutus and was flattering him. Cassius only tells Brutus what he wants to hear. Brutus was, in a way, vulnerable to Cassius' persuasion because Brutus had a hint of sadness in his tone which Cassius took advantage of. Cassius was friendly to Brutus and said that Brutus was worthy. Cassius also takes advantage of Brutus' fears of Caesar as king; Cassius also uses his memories of Caesar's physical weakpoints which greatly influence Brutus.
ReplyDeleteOur group saw this and acted out the different tones. Acting friendly towards a person would cause the prson to become more open to new ideas because the person would trust you more like a friend. This is one of the ways Cassius persuades Brutus, and this is also one of the tones we acted out. I suspect a devious tone from Cassius because he is scheming of a plot involving Brutus. Our group saw Cassius as a devious man who acted confidently. Brutus in the radio seems to act scared for his people when the crowd chants Caesar's name. I did not depict Brutus' tone to be like that, but instead I thought it would be less deep and dark. The actors in the radio acted accordingly to the tone in the book.
After listening (and reading along) to the radio version of Julius Caesar (I.ii.113-220), I first thought about how I interpreted Cassius’ and Brutus’ tones as they spoke. Although most lines were similar to how I thought the actors would say it, some were rather different. When I say different, I mean that I imagined Cassius’ tone to be a bit whiney and possibly panicky, but instead it sounded confident, playful, and mocking. One example where I realized this was when Cassius told Brutus his story (I.ii.97-138). Seeing this made me look at the lines with a whole different point of view. However, this mainly applied to Cassius’ actor because he was the persuader, thus he had to express more emotion, while Brutus’ actor’s tone was exactly how I imagined it to be in the scene.
ReplyDeleteOur group interpreted Cassius's and Brutus's tones line by line. The way our group interpreted the tones were very similar to the audio itself. However, I do strongly believe the audio did support our readings. The audio aided the imagery and identify the bias clearly. The actors followed the pattern of a blank verse and pause where there was a punctuation mark. Our group did not, we did not take intense notice of the sentence structure. Cassius is very sly and cunning in terms of leading Brutus in his "own direction." Brutus's tone seems virtuous, having his own principles but giving in in the end.
ReplyDeleteOur group decided to give Cassius a serious tone, oppose to a pleasant or playful tone. We attempted to depict the emotions of the characters if they were truly here. As for Brutus, he thinks about what he says, he does not blurt out what he thinks. He plays with his words that arouses the attention of Cassius, such as "I will consider; what you have say I will with patience hear and find a time" (act 1, scene 2 lines 177-178). This was the reason why our group changed the tone of each character, trying our best to add suspense and character to the text that will elicit our bias more efficiently.
Shifts in the tone tells us, the readers to next part of the text. It may let us foreshadow what will happen and gives us a possible image in our heads of what is to come. A shift in tone indicates the tactics being used by informing the readers the vibe and atmosphere of the current part(s).
1) The group depicted Cassius and Brutus differently than the actors from the BBC Radio adaptation. Overall, my group members believed Cassius would have sly and mischievous tone, similar to the typical villain from a movie. At the same time, Cassius would be a talented orator capable of switching between convincing and deeply angry tones. The group thought Brutus would speak in a majestic and humbly honest tone, especially in I.ii.90-96. My group members also agreed that Brutus would have doubtful elements mixed in with his voice, given his distrust of Julius as king.
ReplyDelete2) Many notable tones and tone shifts are utilized by the voice actors from the BBC Radio edition of Julius Caesar. Starting from I.ii.60-98, Cassius uses a courteous, laudatory tone while talking about Brutus. When Brutus responds to Cassius (I.ii.69-71), he uses a cautious and suspicious tone, questioning the point behind Cassius’ words. The conversation is briefly interrupted by the crowd cheering in the background, and Brutus once again implores Cassius to explain the reason behind the talk, taking on a prideful tone as he assures the other man that he will fight for a noble cause. I.ii.90-96 During I.ii.107-138, Cassius uses a passionately mocking and acerbic tone as he relates two experiences displaying Caesar’s supposed weak physical state. During I.ii.142-170, Cassius employs a conspiratorial and disdainful tone while he describes Caesar’s high status and Brutus’ relatively low status. In lines I.ii.171-184, Brutus responds in a thoughtful yet reluctant manner, promising to meet Cassius later and admitting his reluctance to be a subject under a king.
3) The group’s thoughts and the BBC Radio performance had similarities and differences regarding tone. The group’s thoughts about Cassius’ skilled tone shift matched the voice actor’s depiction in the radio version. Cassius was able to praise Brutus effectively with his admiring tone, and became incredulous and mocking when drawing attention to Caesar’s faults. Caesar was also able to utilize the flattery tactic via a confident, amiable tone. On the contrary, Cassius sounded much nobler and persuasive in the BBC Radio performance than our group had believed he would sound. Cassius’ impersonations of Julius Caesar, for instance, while talking about Caesar’s physical drawbacks were especially influential in displaying scorn. Brutus sounded stronger and more confident than the group had imagined, but generally met expectations. The BBC Radio adaptation of Julius Caesar expressed vivid tone shifts and emotions left to interpretation in the printed script of the play.
Our group interpreted Cassius and Brutus differently than the actors from the BBC Radio cast. We believed Cassius would have a sly and mischievous tone. Cassius would also switch his tones between convincing and deeply angry tones. Our group thought that Brutus would have doubtful elements mixed in with his voice, given his distrust of Julius as king.
ReplyDeleteThere were many tones and shifts in the BBC Radio cast of Julius Caesar. Starting from I.ii.37-41, Cassius uses a caring tone while talking about how Brutus is acting. When Brutus responds to Cassius (I.ii.42-53), he uses an understanding tone, telling Cassius his problem. The conversation is briefly interrupted by the crowd cheering in the background, and Brutus then implores Cassius to explain the reason behind the talk, using a desperate tone as he assures the other man that he will do want Cassius wants if he tells him. During I.ii.107-138, Cassius uses a mocking tone as he describes two scenes which displayed Caesar’s supposed weak physical state. During I.ii.142-170, Cassius employs a persuading tone while he describes how high Caesar is compared to the lowly Brutus. Then in I.ii.171-184, Brutus responds in a reluctant tone, promising Cassius to meet him later and telling Cassius how he does not want to be a subject of a king.
Our group's interpretations and the BBC radio cast had its similarities as well as its differences. Our group had thought Cassius had changed his tone many times during the radio cast. Also Cassius praised Brutus effectively with his admiring tone, which became mocking when drawing attention to Caesar’s faults. Cassius also sounded more persuasive in the BBC Radio cast than our group had believed he would sound. Also Brutus sounded more confident than our group had imagined.
The shifts in tone had shown how the tactics were used in the cast. We noticed how Cassius was caring, then admiring and finally mocking as the scene progressed. Also we saw how Brutus' pride diminished as well. The tone showed how easily the atmosphere shifted as it went on.
At first, my group thought that Cassius was not all that confident but in a way he was kind of jumpy or alarmed. After hearing this he seems quite confident. He can also be quite sneaky and very sly in the way he acts and performs his actions. Cassius seeing that he was the persuader did evoke some convincing and influential things. For example, he talks about Caesars struggles and he uses Brutus's fear of Caesar becoming king to his benefit.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand Brutus who does not really show that much emotion was almost if not the same as my group had envisioned. He is very cautious in what he says and does. Brutus agrees in meeting Cassius later on due to his opposition of having Caesar rule as king. Brutus's unwillingness to have Caesar as king was advantageous for Cassius.
1. In class, my group imagined Cassius to be conniving and stealthy. After all, Cassius was trying to convince Brutus to undertake the dastardly deed of betraying Caesar. My group concluded, based on I.ii.37-59., that Cassius was simply telling Brutus exactly what he wanted him to hear. Cassius attempted to act friendly and he used this as a means of persuasion. For my group, these lines were important when trying to imagine the dialogue between Cassius and Brutus.
ReplyDelete2.Upon listening to the BBC Radio version ofJulius Caesar, I noted that Cassius' tone was overly affectionate when he first begins talking to Brutus. It is obvious that Cassius does this so that Brutus will "warm up" toward him. Also, in response to Brutus' lines I.II. 49-3, Cassius seems genuinely upset and it appears that he actually cares for Brutus' well being. However, as a reader, I know that Cassius is simply faking these tones; he is only deceiving Brutus. Later, in lines I.ii.72-82, Cassius' tone becomes a bit facetious, as he jokes with Brutus. Then, in lines I.ii.99-138, Cassius' tone becomes emotional and I believe this is moment where he almost loses his composure; he becomes too passionate and this has the potential of driving Brutus away. Yet, it does not as we later find out. Additionally, Cassius shows more emotion in I.ii.150-170 as he shows an even greater dislike for Caesar. By the end of Cassius' talk with Brutus, Cassius leaves smug and content.
Brutus also has shifts in tone during his chat with Cassius. In the beginning, Brutus is resisting Cassius (like he should be!) and his tone indicates that he does not really want to talk. However, he soon beings to loosen up, although, not entirely. In lines I.ii, 69-71, Brutus is clearly feeling apprehensive and he does not trust Cassius. Eventually though, after Cassius' lines I.ii.150-170, Brutus' tone change even more. He seems to be considering Cassius' proposal and he is slowly turning against Caesar. By the end of the chat, it is fair to say that Brutus has made up his mind: he is going to join the conspiracy.
3. My group used many of the same tactics that Cassius used when persuading Brutus. My group members and I used something along the lines of faux friendship when persuading one another in the various scenarios. Cassius certainly uses this tactic to get Brutus on his good side. In addition, Cassius uses other persuasion strategies that my group did not use, such as evoking strong emotion and dramatizing events (this can be seen in the various anecdotes that Cassius shares with Brutus). I think that the tactics used by the actors in BBC Radio help to better convey Shakespeare's intended emotions. The actors help to bring the play to life, which is useful when reading a play for the first time.
Cassius' tone was not constant throughout the recording. It changes depending on Cassius' approach when trying to win Brutus over. Cassius uses many tactics in convincing Brutus, his tone changing with each one. Cassius tries to logically reason with Brutus, and at some point, even tries to get inside Brutus' head. Tone plays to Cassius' advantage, for he can evoke several different emotions (of the characters and the reader) simply by offering a change in tone.
ReplyDeleteListening to the audio gave me a different perspective on the play. I realize now how much I misinterpreted parts of the reading. Understanding the tone being used helped me understand what was transpiring. The play makes a lot more sense now that I understand the tone being used.
My group and I imagined Cassius and Brutus as the devil persuading a person to join the dark side. Cassius convinces Brutus to go against Caesar like the devil would convince an innocent person to do bad deeds. Cassius' tone changes from courteous and careful to shrewd and cunning. Brutus' tone changes from suspicious to confused and reluctant. After listening to part of the radio broadcast of Julius Caesar, the way the actors depicted Cassius and Brutus was very similar to how my group imagined them. Once again, it was like a devil convincing an innocent person to commit a crime. The shift in tone shows how Cassius went with a causal greeting to a more successful tactic similar to peer pressuring.
ReplyDelete1) My group thought that Brutus’ tone would be unsure when talking to Cassius, because he doesn’t know if he should take his Caesar’s side or Cassius. It seems as if he is confused and starts to fear that Caesar might actually become king( I.ii.85-86.). We thought that Cassius might be sly and desperate by continuously trying to get Brutus on his side. Cassius does this by telling Brutus a story about Caesar( I.ii.130-136.).
ReplyDelete2) When Cassius talks to Brutus it sounds as if he is pleading him to join their conspiracy against Caesar( I.ii.190-191.). In addition, Cassius uses flattery on Brutus ( I.ii.149-152.). Brutus shifts from not wanting to hear Cassius’ ideas about Caesar to wanting to meet up with Cassius to continue talking about what to do about Caesar( I.ii.33-36. and I.ii.315-319.).
3) I think our ideas on how the characters, Brutus and Cassius, are depicted in the book compared to the radio broadcast was not that far apart, but they were certain details that were brought forth when listening. You could actually picture some of the characters when they spoke, and by this you could see tones change. For example, Brutus starts off with a monotone voice with no interest and then he generally starts to be hooked and eventually gives in to meeting Cassius later on. These shifts in tone helps give you a picture of what the character is thinking.
My group's interpretation were not to off. we depicted the tone of Flavius and Marullus accurately, however we did not have as much of a violent tone of voice when speaking to the Carpenter and Cobbler. In addition the Cobbler and Carpenter had much more playful voices in the beginning despite how harshly they were being spoken to.
ReplyDeleteCassius's tone was very sly,he spoke slowly so that all his words seem to be taken in by Brutus. his slow approach to the matter of things seems to be testing Brutus, to see how far he would go, he must have doubt about where Brutus's loyalty stands if he doesn't immediately propose his plan to him. its different from what my group envisioned i envisioned his voice to sound melancholy and annoyed, however his tone was neutral not too happy, yet not too sad. it was also a bit sarcastic especially when talking about Caesar.
Brutus's tone was very tired in my opinion, i did notice however that the more Cassius began to complement Brutus the more his tone changes, as if he was beginning to believe Cassius more and more. i envisioned Brutus as more of a cheerful person, who sees the best in everyone at first, however Brutus can be sneaky too. I also noticed that when Caesar come into the picture many of the characters tones become sneaky and serious and their always whispering with each other.
1) My group and I came to a conclusion that Caius Cassius has an aptitude for controlling people by convincing them to think the way he does. Cassius used a compassionate tone to attempt to convince Brutus to throw down Caesar. In the beginning of Act I, Scene II, Brutus was confused; Shakespeare describes him as being at war with himself. He was having a hard time realizing what is most important, his friendship with Caesar or the welfare of Rome. Cassius was nonchalant and cautious, as he tried to engage Brutus in a conversation. Cassius tells Brutus that he has seen a change of personality in him, “Brutus, I do observe you now of late/ I have not from your eyes that gentleness/ And show of love as I was wont to have./ You bear too stubborn and too strange a hand/ Over your friend that loves you” (I.ii.37—41). Later, Cassius shifts to a conceited tone. He boasts Brutus’ pride by showing Brutus they both of them are as great as Caesar, if not greater; he says, “I was born free as Caesar. So were you./ We both have fed as well, and we can both/ Endure the winter’s cold as well as he” (I.ii.104—6). At the end of Act I, Scene II, Brutus is more confident. He now knows what he must for the welfare of Rome: follow Cassius’ lead.
ReplyDelete2) The BBC version of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar reveals a different side to the characters. From I.ii.62, Cassius uses a gentle tone to ask Brutus why he has a sudden change in personality. Brutus is vigilant, and attempts to leave, thinking that talking to Cassius about Caesar is not safe (I.ii.70). Brutus remains quiet for much of the conversation, revealing that he is thinking about Cassius’ words. Cassius, knowing this, uses this moment to his advantage by showing Brutus that Caesar is not as brave as he claims he is. Soon, Cassius shifts to a mocking tone as he makes fun of Caesar on the day he saved his life (I.ii.131—5; this reveals a more caustic side to Cassius. Brutus listens to Cassius’ comments, and seems rather engaged. He does not attempt to change the subject of the conversation, but constantly points out the noise in the background, suggesting that Caesar has once again done something “great.” Cassius’ tone shifts, once again; now he boasts himself and Brutus. From I.ii.160—5, Cassius shows Brutus that he is Caesar’s equal. Cassius says, “Brutus and Caesar—what should be in that “Caesar”?/ Why should that name be sounded more than yours?/ Write them together, yours is as fair a name./ Sound them, it doth become the mouth as well./ Weigh them, it is as heavy” (I.ii.150—160). From I.ii.180—5, Brutus is half-heartedly accepts Cassius’ thoughts, and agrees to meet him for further plans.
3)My group and I had reached conclusions that were, in some ways, similar and different to those reached by BBC. We believed that Cassius’ main tactics in persuading Brutus were flattery and sympathy. After listening to BBC, however, I realized that Brutus accepted Cassius’ thoughts because of Cassius’ mockery towards Caesar. Cassius told Brutus about the day he had to save “great” Caesar from drowning. Furthermore, he shows to Brutus how Caesar is, in some ways, inferior to them. Cassius describes Caesar’s actions to being similar to those of “a sick girl.” He continues further by saying, “Ye gods, it doth amaze me/ A man of such a feeble temper should/ So get the start of the majestic world/ And bear the palm alone” (I.ii.131—5). Brutus’ silent indicates that he is contemplating Cassius’ thoughts. Cassius also says that Brutus is equal to Caesar. He says, “Brutus and Caesar—what should be in that “Caesar”?/ Why should that name be sounded more than yours?/ Write them together, yours is as fair a name./ Sound them, it doth become the mouth as well./ Weigh them, it is as heavy” (I.ii.150—160). Finally, Cassius shows that in some ways, Brutus is superior to Caesar; he says, “There was a Brutus once that would
ReplyDeletehave brooked/ Th' eternal devil to keep his state in Rome/ As easily as a king.” Brutus already had mixed feelings about Caesar. Cassius just enforced the side that favored the welfare of Rome, even if it meant harming Caesar.
Delete1. My group envisioned Cassius as cunning and manipulative. We thought Cassius was going to great lengths to convince Brutus to join his side instead of Caesar’s. We thought Brutus’s tone would be indecisive and confused but rather in the recording, the actor’s tone of voice tended to change as Cassius began to speak more about Caesar.
ReplyDelete2. In the recording, at the beginning, Cassius’s tone was pleasant but careful. However, as I began to listen more, I understood that Cassius’s tone had changed to crafty and sly because he was trying to recruit Brutus to join in the plot against Caesar. In addition, Cassius tried to use adulation to try and convince Brutus. Brutus’s tone was slightly different from the original thought my group had in mind. Brutus’s tone sounded weary but firm. At first it seems that Brutus does not want to be bothered by Cassius but he begins to relent once Cassius starts praising and flattering him. The actor for Cassius makes his tone shift from cheerful to sly and the actor for Brutus makes his tone shift from reluctant to drained.
3. In my group, we used similar tactics to the ones the actors used to convey the shift in tone. For example, the actor for Cassius uses flattery or praise to get Brutus to talk to him and this is shown by the fake cheerfulness in his tone. We used persuasion to show the cheeriness in our tone during the activity in class. By examining the shifts in tone, my group was able to understand why the tactics being used by the characters matched the tone of voice they used.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete1) In class, my group and I imagined Cassius as sly, stealthy, and deceiving. We imagined this because of the fact that Cassius was trying to get Brutus to betray Caesar. We knew that Cassius was praising Brutus, but we decided that all this was an act by Cassius, in order to persuade Brutus. However, we imagined Brutus as honorable, and patriotic. We also imagined him as very buff (because of his name).
ReplyDelete2) While listening to the recording of Julius Caesar, I saw that Cassius’s tone was incredibly flattering. In fact he was so flattering that it soon becomes increasingly obvious that Cassius was just trying to persuade Brutus that he was greater than Caesar. Cassius talks as if he genuinely cares for Caesar. When hearing Brutus speak, I can tell from his tone that he is hesitant to listen to Cassius at first. However, as time progresses, and the flattery is laid increasingly thicker, Brutus’s tone changes to show that he is a little more acceptant of Cassius’s views.
3) In class, when my group and I were trying to persuade each other in the various scenarios given to us, we used many of the same tactics that Cassius uses to persuade Brutus. For example, Cassius uses flattery to get Brutus to listen to him. In the scenario when I tried to persuade someone in my group to move a test date, I also used flattery. However, my group also used blackmail as a method of persuasion and Cassius did not. The shifts in view allow us to track the current emotional status of the characters in the recording.
1) Our group imagined Cassius as a very deceiving person who tried to manipulate Brutus's mind into joining him against Caesar. Cassius used flattery and other tactics into captivating Brutus. We also imagined Brutus as a humble person who had his own way of thinking but gave in into Cassius's plan.
ReplyDelete2) In BBC version of the play, you can actually notice more of how Cassius tries to lure Brutus into his revolt; also you could tell how Brutus slowly gets lured by Cassius. "BRUTUS:
What means this shouting? I do fear, the people
Choose Caesar for their king." "CASSIUS: Ay, do you fear it?
Then must I think you would not have it so."(I.ii.80-83)In these lines, I pictured Cassius just stating that he doesn't really want Caesar as king, but in the audio version, I could really tell he was already halfway stuck in Cassius's plan. Cassius slowly questions Brutus to let him think about it and then at the right time, Cassius snaps his trap to keep Brutus on his side.
Cassius also talks about how less respected they are compared to Caesar even though they were all born the same; yet, Caesar gets to become king. Saying this, Cassius questions what is in Caesar that isn't in Brutus; he flatters Brutus and tries to make him think of himself as being just as great.
3) The choices about the images of Cassius and Brutus we made as a group were very similar to the images that were presented by the BBC audio version of the play. A difference between the two were that more of the deceiving tactics could be noticeable in Cassius's voice. At first, Cassius seemed uninterested in Brutus's concerns about Caesar, but later in the performance, you can tell that Cassius is suggesting an opinion about Caesar and how he wants Brutus to join him.
1) On friday, our group came up with the conclusion that Cassius is a very sly and convincing character in the play. We came to this conclusion by noticing that Cassius was trying to convince Brutus to join his side instead of staying with Caesar. This shows that Cassius has the ability to convince someone that is very close with Caesar. On the other hand, we imagined Brutus as a very loyal and trustworthy man. In my opinion, he does not get easily convinced and he knows what is right and wrong.
ReplyDelete2) In the radio version, I was able to hear the tone of Cassius speaking to Brutus. He speaks in a very somber yet soft voice. The radio version made it very easy for me to catch on that Cassius was trying to persuade Brutus. At first, Brutus is very firm as he speaks. But as Cassius continues to praise and flatter Brutus, he turns to an opening in his thoughts. Brutus' voice changed within the few minutes of the radio version of the play. His voice sounded as if he knew it was wrong to betray Caesar but Cassius was a respected friend. Throughout the scene, Brutus seemed hesitant to listen to what Cassius has to say.
3) In class on Friday, my group tried to use blackmail, flattery, and pity to convince all three scenarios . We did use Cassius' tactic of flattering the opponent. Cassius uses this flattery tactic to persuade Brutus to join him in the plot to overtake Caesar. The shifts in tone indicate the mood and feelings of each character. For example, when listening to Brutus speak, it could be clearly imaged that he was hesitant to continue to listen to Cassius.
1) Cassius was trying to persuade Brutus into joining the conspiracy on Caesar. As we read Act I in class, my group thought Cassius was sly and that his tone was deceitful. Brutus was on Caesar's side, however, as he talked to Cassius he seemed unsure about Caesar becoming king. He started to fear it. His tone was confused, as if he couldn't choose a side.
ReplyDelete2) Throughout the conversation with Brutus, Cassius is manipulative and flattering. He is trying to persuade Brutus, but isn't very insistent. He chooses his words carefully while speaking to Brutus, to make him change his side and join the revolt. He questions Brutus and slowly, Brutus seems to be persuaded. At the beginning of the conversation, Brutus is on Caesar's side and doesn't care to listen to Cassius talk about Caesar. However, as the conversation goes on, Brutus's tone shifts to being unsure and even considers what Cassius is saying.
3) My group's analysis of Brutus and Cassius's tone were close to that of the audio file. We knew that Cassius was sly and was trying to persuade Brutus.We also knew that Brutus was slowly persuaded. However, listening to the video, I could imagine the conversation. I could also hear their change in tone during the conversation, making identifying the change in tone and tactics much easier. Cassius talks to Brutus as if he cares for him and believes that they deserve better, than Caesar, a supposed god who needed help out the river. In this conversation, Cassius's tone is serious and questioning, making convincing Brutus to change sides easier. In the recording, Cassius seems more sly and Brutus sounds more unsure than when reading it. The actors from the recording depicted the tone of the play nicely.
1. My group saw Cassius as a manipulative friend, who used others to harvest his deeper desires. When re-reading Act II, we noticed how he plants some of these ideas into Brutus’ head. Though, Brutus may have been saddened by his fear of Caesar’s possible ruling position as “dictator” of Rome, he didn’t really see himself becoming the leader of a conspiracy against Caesar. Brutus, however, has a significant change in attitude. He goes from sad, and uncertain, to angry and determined to prevent Caesar from becoming Rome’s leader. Cassius plants this idea that by ridding Rome of Caesar, he will be protecting the Roman citizens. Brutus appears to use this as a coping mechanism, to reassure himself that what he is doing is right.
ReplyDelete1) According to my group's interpretation, we believed that the tone of Cassius was rather confident, when he was also talking in a playful and mischievous way. In addition, we observed that Brutus questioned the trust of Caesar as a king, for example, Brutus questioned to himself whether or not Caesar would be corrupted by power. Our group expected Brutus' tones to change as the act progressed.
ReplyDelete2) After hearing the audio file, I realized that I have made many misinterpretations when reading the play. For example, the changes in tone in the audio file helped me understand the situation (or situations) set up in the play. Basically, the audio file helped ELEVATE my understanding of the play.
I also learned that tones can bring certain advantages of the character. For example, Cassius changes his tone to evoke a variety of emotions to others, as I observed. Now, I understand that tone is not simply a change in voice, but a change in voice that can help a character get what he/she wants.
3) The few tactics that were used in my group's "acting" were bribery, blackmail, sympathy, and seduction. In the radio cast, however, I observed how the tone used by the characters affected the tactics they were using too. Cassius sounded confident and persuasive, so his tactic, to me, was very effective.
Elevators!!!
Delete2. From the radio recording, Cassius is portrayed as a patient, and gentle guy who cares about his friend. Underlying this outer shell, Cassius can be seen a cunning and manipulative guy who uses other people to get what he desires. As the recording progresses, Cassius become more determined, and his tactics become more aggressive, as the actor helps make clear what Cassius motives are, and how he’s going to go about achieving what he wants. Brutus also becomes more aggressive, toward this “conspiracy.” At first he seem unsure, and not fully aware of what he’s getting himself into; but Cassius’s continuing flattery, and motivation eventually pushes Brutus off the edge of “reasonable.”
ReplyDelete3. Compared to what my group originally thought of these dense characters, the radio recording kind of enhanced our suspicions. The tone of the actors gave me more of an insight on Cassius, and Brutus’ personalities. I can vividly picture these characters animatedly, and draw a valid conclusion on what I think is happening, or may happen.
1)My group imagined Cassius as having a furtive and cunning nature. Cassius pretended to show compassion and an interest in Brutus's distress (I.ii.54-59); however, his only intention was to get Brutus interested in the idea of overthrowing Caesar. My group and I were able to see this when Cassius began to focus more on Caesar's power over people rather then Brutus. Cassius begins to tell a story of how he saved Caesars life when they both jumped into the Tiber River. "Caesar cried 'Help me Cassius, or I sink!'/ I, as Aeneas, our great ancestor/ Did from the flames of Troy upon his shoulder/ The old Anchises bear, so from the waves of Tiber/ Did I the tired Caesar(I.ii.118-122)." Cassius used stories and even talked about Brutus's ancestor, Lucius Junius Brutus who drove out the last of the ancient kings of Rome and founded the Roman Republic in order to grab Brutus's attention (I.ii.167-170).
ReplyDeleteBrutus,I believe is a weak character who can be easily persuaded with compliments and great stories. Unlike Cassius, Brutus is not confident but rather humble and that is why I believe he is easily persuaded by Cassius who uses these signs of weakness to lure Brutus.
2) In the beginning of the recording, Cassius displays a tender and benevolent tone. He tries to help Brutus in time of distress. This was especially evident when Cassius told Brutus, "So well as by reflection, I, your glass,/ Will modestly discover to yourself/ That of yourself which you yet know not of (I.ii.74-76)" However, Cassius becomes passionate about his belief in overthrowing Caesar that his tone begins to express more confidence. Signs of compassion begin to escape his tone as a fierce nature takes its place. He no longer takes interest in Brutus's nature but rather begins to explain that Caesar is just as equal as they are and yet he holds more power. Cassius focuses more on Caesar's power over people and its cons as he states,"And this man/ Is now become a god, and Cassius is/ A wretched creature and must bend his body/ If Caesar carelessly but nod on him (I.ii. 122-125)." In the recording it is clear that Cassius is eager to talk about Caesar's weaknesses rather then help Brutus. Cassius becomes passionate and talks with more emotion when he tries to persuade to Brutus that Caesar is in mo measure greater then them. This is return makes Brutus uncomfortable to the point where he tells Cassius, "I will consider; what you have to say/ I will with patience hear, and find a time/ Both meet to hear and answer such high tings (I.ii.177-179)" Still, we know from our reading that Brutus is eventually persuaded to join Cassius because he is paid many compliments. Therefore, you can see that Brutus's tone shifts from a somber feeling where he tries to neglect Cassius to one where he is thoughtful and eager to discuss the topic Cassius just presented to him.
3) My group used many tactics that Cassius used to persuade Brutus. For example, my group,like Cassius, complimented and showed compassion to the person we tried to persuade. We tried to present ourselves in a friendly manner that would appear appealing. However, Cassius began to express such passion and evoke emotions from his "friend" which captivated the person's attention. Our group used another tactic where we explained to the person the horrific events that would precede if the person did not agree to join the cause we were for.
The shifts in tones helped bring the play to life. Most importantly, I made the character more vivid letting the audience understand the play better. This is so, because the audience can hear conflicting personalities and those are are being manipulated by other, more powerful personalities.
1. In the passage, Cassius used a pushy, yet casual tone. He knew exactly what to say towards Brutus in order to "play" him correctly. He takes advantage of Brutus's weak point, namely Caesar. Brutus acted with a bit of sadness and doubt in his voice and words. He seemed sightly relived when Cassius drove away from the topic of the order, only to feel a bit agitated when they return back to the topic a couple of lines later.
ReplyDelete2. Cassius- he is mainly sly and playful. He says his lines with a "knowing-all" tone.
Brutus- he is cautious. He sounds almost uncomfortable talking with Cassius about Caesar.
3. My group acted out in many ways on Friday. We saw from ourselves and others that different tones used by persuaders bought out different responses from the people being persuaded. From the radio performance, the tones the actors used showed what tatics were used. It was easy to realize that Cassius is almost toying with Brutus and Brutus is upset and a bit uncomfortable. This can be seen as Cassius' plan from the start of the conversation.
1)My group on Friday thought that Cassius would have a mischievous tone and deceiving character since he tried to convince Brutus into betraying Caesar. Cassius attempted to persuade Brutus to join him by complimenting and praising him. Brutus, on the other hand, had a more humble character and was more honorable. He was not easily fooled by Cassius’ convincing and knows his conscience.
ReplyDelete2)In the recording provided of the BBC radio version of Julius Caesar, the conversation between Cassius and Brutus seems casual as they talk about their views of the people wanting Caesar as their king. However, as their conversation continued, Cassius tone began to become overly flattering when convincing Brutus and acts as if he cares of Caesar. At I.ii.96-138, Cassius mocks Caesar jokingly of Caesar’s physically weak state and temper. The tone of Brutus’ voice seems hesitant in answering Cassius, for he is loyal to Caesar, but also respects Cassius and accepts his views of Caesar and does not think too much of it.
3)My group’s tactics of trying to convince the opposing character by usage of flattering, evoking sympathy, and pleading. There were also some instances when Arif tried to convince me in letting him stay out late by blackmailing, which was not presented in the BBC radio performance of Julius Caesar. Cassius uses tactics of flattery to persuade Brutus to agree with his view of Caesar. The shifts in tones and tactics being used in the recording helped aid the listener in the responses of the characters. It portrays the feelings and mood of the character such as when Brutus was hesitant in responding to Cassius’ views of Caesar. His sudden pause let us know that he was unsure of how to answer Cassius.
1. From Friday's class about tone and shifts in tone, our group found Cassius as an opportunistic person. Cassius saw the opportunity to sway Brutus's loyalty to Caesar and he took it. We also saw Brutus as a person being able to persuade easily. Even though his loyalty was very strong and dedicated to Caesar, Cassius was able to pit him against Caesar regardless.
ReplyDelete2. After listening to the audio file, I noticed that my assumptions of which tones were being used were wrong. An example of this is when Cassius first starts talking to Brutus. My thoughts of the tone, based from the reading, was monotone and boring. I assumed this because whenever I read, I feel that there should be mutual feelings since they are just words on a page. However, based on what I heard, Cassius is actually a very persuasive person. He stresses out the cons of Caesar, but also stresses the positives of joining his side.
3. Our group was correct about Cassius's personality and tone when compared to the radio performance. We were also correct about Brutus. From the radio performance, questions of being unsure were asked when the tone was nervous or unsteady. When a serious tone was required, the actors would be pressuring to try to sway opinions. By reading and listening, it helped my comprehension of the play much more.
(1) Last week, my table and I decided that Cassius was a sneaky and persuasive person in the play. We thought this because we saw that Cassius was trying to convince Brutus to help him kill Julius Caesar instead of sticking with his dear friend. This shows that Cassius is able to convert someone that is close friends with Julius. On the other hand, my group and I thought of Brutus as an honest and reliable character.
ReplyDelete(2) In the radio version of the play, I was able to hear the tones of Cassius and Brutus clearly. Cassius speaks in a calm, but confident voice in trying to convince Brutus of his ways. At first, Brutus is firm and denying as they talk. Yet as Cassius goes on with flattering Brutus, he starts to consider what Cassius is trying to say. Brutus' tone changed a lot in this version of the play. He sounded like that even though he showed sympathy to Cassius' plan, he didn't like the idea of hurting Julius Caesar.
(3) Last Friday in class, Arif tried to use blackmail, flattery, and pity to convince Rebecca in all three scenarios. He did use Cassius' idea of saying nice things the opponent. Cassius uses flattery to convince Brutus to understand that Caesar is the bad guy. The changes in tone show the feelings of every character. Throughout the radio version, anyone can clearly hear that Brutus understands what Cassius is trying to say, but is unsure if he should betray Caesar. Cassius on the other hand, is confident with his plan, and seems to have no doubt that Brutus will join him, so he is calm.
Frishta A.
ReplyDeleteAfter evaluating what my group has discussed we have come to a conclusion that Cassius can be viewed as a sly fox. He is also a person who is very manipulative and persuasive at his words. Cassius has the upper hand in his conversations with other people due to the fact that he sets the land mines and tells the other party what they want and wish to hear. He gives them exact amount of what they want and then grabs their attention and lures them to his side.
After listening to the radio version of the play, I was able to distinguish better what tone each character was trying to portray. I was also able to understand a deeper meaning of each characters words. Cassius starts of with a normal greeting, and Brutus seems less interested in a conversation engaged with Cassius. But then Cassius questions Brutus' loyal of their friendship. Brutus' tone now changes and he speak calmly trying to gain sympathy from Cassius. After the shouting the conversation between the two men heat up because the topic revolves around Caesar. Now Brutus begins to be more interested in the conversation. Cassius tone changes as the plot progresses especially to the point where he is talking about Caesar drowning. When he talks about that moment his tone is mocking towards Caesar and laughing at his flashback of Caesar's weaknesses. His mocking tone shows his hatred towards Caesar.
In my group I was the persuader and Aliyah was the person I was persuading. During the process the many tactics that I used was sympathy, peer pressure, and guilt. Compared to Cassius who used flattery and reassurance. I was trying to evoke emotion within Aliyah of some sort of sympathy to lend me the money. I thought that Brutus new what was coming and saw his intentions.
1) On Friday, my group depicted Cassius speaking condescendingly to Brutus because of how my group thought that Brutus was a favorite of Caesar. Because of this, Cassius then tries to recruit Brutus to participate in his conspiracy by getting him to affirm his feelings toward Caesar if he were to become king. My group noted the tactics Cassius used to persuade Brutus and assert his feelings. We saw that Cassius acted as a mirror for Brutus to help him “find himself” in such a situation because since Brutus has became so used to being respected due to his high position, he cannot see any way in which Caesar being crowned would present such a problem to him. Cassius helped Brutus relate to him and uncover feelings within him that made him feel uneasy of Caesar coming to power. Both of their tones shifted dynamically throughout the dialogue with Cassius speaking condescendingly towards Brutus which then changed into a friendly, sympathetic tone once he realized that they both did not want to see Caesar crowned. Cassius on the other hand was pretty much static and remained quite humble but became more aware as the conversation progressed.
ReplyDelete2) During the first listen of BBC’s version of Julius Caesar, I noticed the flow of the conversation between Cassius and Brutus and how they were talking to each other with such ease. After a minute into the dialogue, I realized that Cassius was merely manipulating Brutus and in no time they were sharing some of Caesar’s “not so great moments” (I.ii.100-123) and started to doubt his worthiness for such a position. Although Brutus tries to avoid conversation with Cassius, Cassius presses on and soon has Brutus with the mindset that he had intended to put in him. Both characters stop abruptly each time the crowd cheers for Caesar which introduces a new discussion on the aspects of Caesar. Overall Cassius is manipulative, changing tones to suit his objective from apprehensive to friendly and sympathetic. Brutus in the beginning is resistant towards Cassius but becomes more aware of his feelings towards Caesar.
3) The shifts in tone indicates Cassius’s tactic of manipulation and as Brutus subjects to it, his tone changes as well. Cassius starts off questioning Brutus and as he gains a hold of him in the conversation his tone changes to support his objective. Cassius becomes more friendly and sympathetic to Brutus as Brutus realizes his feelings towards the situation of Caesar. This allows Brutus to relate more and more with Cassius as he establishes a mindset in Brutus similar to his. Brutus’s shifts in tone indicate that Cassius was successful in persuading him to agree with his points. When the dialogue ends, it leaves Brutus wondering and thoughtful but not as uncertain as before.
Nishat C.
ReplyDelete1. Cassius and Brutus were two unique characters because they have distinct views on the events that were taking place. Therefore my group believed that Cassius and Brutus had completely different tone. Cassius seems like a character that would be cunning but a bit frustrated with the fact that Brutus is hesitant in making a decision. Cassius also said his words very confidently so Brutus was taking the words to his heart. Brutus, on the other hand, spoke with cautious and doubtfulness. Brutus is confused because he does not see how Caesar could be harmful yet majority of the people are against Caesar, leading Brutus to rethink his decision several times.
2. Listening to the BBC Radio version of Julius Caesar, showed different tones of both Cassius and Brutus. Cassius tries to make Brutus feel haughty and an equal to Caesar. Cassius sounds devoted and doting Brutus in the beginning. He creates this mentality that he cares for Brutus. But Brutus seems wise enough to question Cassius “Into what dangers would you lead me, Cassius, that you would have me seek into myself for that which is not in me?” (I.ii.69-71).
Brutus starts off with a resistant tone. He sees that Cassius is clearly trying to place his life in danger. As their conversation progresses, however, Brutus is swallowing Cassius words and considering them in lines I.ii.150-170. When their conversation near an end, Brutus convincing tone that he would help in this plan for the people in lines I.ii.176-179.
3. My group had similar tactics to those of Cassius. My group members used words to make the persuader feel more proud of him; this tactic is definitely evident in Cassius tactics. Even though we had many similar tactics we did not have all of Cassius’ tactics. One example would be Cassius using anecdotes to make Caesar seem inferior and degrade his status to show Brutus he is superior. Cassius also takes different methods to provoke Brutus and make him revolt or at least have mixed feelings about Caesar. Different tones help, us, as readers to picture Cassius mental thought if not his physical appearance.
On Friday, my group and I depicted the tones of both Cassius and Brutus. We guessed that Cassius would have a sly and somewhat devious tone. We also felt that he would have a hint of persuasiveness in his voice since he was effective in convincing others. Brutus was depicted as having a somewhat distressed tone being that he was doubtful about having Julius Caesar as king of Rome. After listening to the radio version of this play, I realize that the actors depict the tones of Cassius and Brutus similarly to how we did. For example, Cassius came off as persuasive as he emphasized negative traits of Caesar to convince Brutus to join him. Also, Brutus has a hint of confidence in his voice but still shows some anxious in his voice as he tries to be careful not to be swayed by Cassius. My group basically matched the tone of the two characters.
ReplyDeleteMe and my group viewed Brutus as a strong-willed yet undecided patrician who is just on the verge of making a very important decision. Cassius, on the other hand, has his mind completely made up and is trying to coax Brutus into joining the conspiracy against Caesar. Colin McFarlane's rendition of Cassius is a work of utter genius and wonderful acting. His voice glides over the dialogue with a very persuasive tone that haunts both Brutus and the audience. Nicholas Farrell's version of Brutus is no less spectacular, for he shows the audience a person yearning to say "yes" but still in the middle of a conflict with his deepest feelings. Nevertheless, Brutus is portrayed with complete seriousness and power (considering his position in society). Both tones and actions of the characters creates a dialogue in which of human emotion and folly is intertwined.
ReplyDeleteIn our group we viewed both Cassius and Brutus to be (at heart0 honest men who are simply misled by suspicion. This recording, on the other hand, reveals to us that Cassius is villain with a sinister purpose, and Brutus's involvement in the plan is only making it worse.
1)My group imagined that Cassius had a very mischeivious tone, and also a sly tone mainly. For shifts in tone, my group thought that he would change from angry to a convincing tone. We thought that brutus would have a humble tone. For shifts in tone, he would shift from a doubtful tone to a yrustful tone.
ReplyDelete2)Cassius: Cassius would switch from a convincing tone to a condescending tone. He would also change to a slightly angry tone and then a gleeful tone. He would also use an acerbic tone to taunt caesar.
Brutus: Brutus would often change his tone from a curius tone to a doubtful tone and vice versa. At the end of the act, Brutus had a reluctant tone.
3)The group'd and BBC radio's choices were similar and differant at the same time. The group thought that Cassius had a convincing tone, and in the BBC radio version, cassius also had a convincing tone. The group thought that Brutus had a humble tone, which he did have in the BBC radio version. Brutus also sounded more vivid and more audible than in the printed version.